Arbitral interpretation of investment treaties : problems and remedies for the debate on "legitimacy"

Santiago Díaz-Cediel

Resumo


The last couple of decades have seen a considerable increase in the submittal of investment claims to Arbitral Tribunals – a process which has often been linked to the “proliferation” of investment treaties. Alongside, a debate on the so-called “legitimacy” of the Investor-State dispute settlement mechanism not only emerged (and prompted calls for reform) but also refuses to go away. Treaty interpretation has not been in the forefront of discussion. Authorized (“authoritative”) interpretation – as performed by Arbitral Tribunals – is perhaps one of the issues of least (if any) concern. This Article explores the distinction between authentic and authorized interpretation vis-à-vis the multiple issues arising from vesting excessive significance in authorized interpretations of Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals, in the events in which States Parties to the relevant investment treaty do not have opposing views on the construction of a conventional clause. Drawing on the referral to the notable cases in which this issue has arisen, this Article will present a few recommendations.

Palavras-chave


International Arbitration, Authentic Interpretation, International Investment Law, Authoritative Interptretation, Law of Treaties

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


AD HOC STATE-STATE ARBITRATION, Italian Republic v. Republic of Cuba (Cuba – Italy Bilateral Investment Treaty). Available: https://www.italaw.com/cases/580

AUST, Anthony. Handbook of International Law, first edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2005.

Colombia, Peru, Mexico, Chile, Additional Protocol to the Framework Agreement on the Pacific Alliance, entry into force in 2016 (signed in 2014).

CONFORTI, Benedetto & FOCARELLI, Carlo, The Law and Practice of the United Nations, fourth edition, Brill – Nijhoff, 2010.

Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States (1965), within the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes.

ICSID. Caratube International Oil Company LLP v. The Republic of Kazakhstan (2012), available at: https://www.italaw.com/cases/211

ICSID. Saipem S.p.A. v. The People´s Republic of Bangladesh (2007), available at: https://www.italaw.com/cases/951

JOHNSON JR., Thomas & GIMBLETT, Jonathan. Gunboats to BITs: The Evolution of Modern International Investment Law, in: SAUVANT, Karl P., Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy. Oxford University Press 2011, pages 649-686.

MAFTEI, Jana & LICUTA COMAN, Varvara. Interpretation of Treaties. 2012. Pages 16-30. Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica, Danubius University.

ORECKI, Marcin. State-to-State Arbitration pursuant to Bilateral Investment Treaties: The Ecuador-US Dispute, 2013, available at: http://www.youngicca-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/State_to_State_Marcin_Orecki_10_02_201.pdf.

PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION. The Republic of Ecuador v. The United States of America, available at: https://www.state.gov/s/l/c53491.htm

POSNER, Theodore R. & DÓZSA, Dániel. The Enduring Role of Diplomacy and Other Tools of State-State Dispute Resolution in a Golden Age of Investor-State Arbitration. Weil World Arbitration Report, pages 2-9, September 2013.

REISMAN, W. Michael. Opinion with respect to jurisdiction in the Interstate Arbitration initiated by Ecuador against the United States, 2012. Available at: https://www.italaw.com/cases/documents/1498

Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules) of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (2006).

SCHEFER, Krista Nadakavukaren. International Investment Law, second edition, Switzerland: Edward Elgar Publishers, 2013.

SHAW, Malcom N. International Law, sixth edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

The Energy Charter Treaty, entry into force in 1998, (signed in 1994).

TIERSMA, Peter M., Legal Language, paperback edition, Chicago and London: The University of Chiacgo Press, 1999.

United States of America, Ecuador. Bilateral Investment Treaty (signed in 1993).

United States of America, Republic of Colombia. Trade Promotion Agreement (2006). Article 10.20, Section 2.

WARREN, Elizabeth. The Trans-Pacific Partnership clause everyone should oppose, The Washington Post, Washington D.C., February 2015.

WELLHAUSEN, Rachel L. Recent Trends in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, volume 7, issue 1, pages 117-135, January 2016.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v16i1.5883

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia