The Principle of Effectiveness as content of Kelsen’s Fundamental Norm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v12i2.3681Keywords:
Teoria Pura do Direito. Norma Fundamental. Princípio da Efetividade.Abstract
The article visits the Kelsen’s Theory Pure of Law in order to discern the fundamental norm not only as a hypothetical logical premise of the legal system, which forms the groundwork of validity of a constitution, but also as a norm of positive law, whose content is identified with the effectiveness principle as a rule of international law in accordance with Kelsen’s monism. In this sense, the use of deductive logic, it must be as a foundation for the solution of the question referred. The conclusion believes that the theoretical review carried out has offered hermeneutic substrates for the content of acts of recognition of State and recognition of government, who based on the principle of effectiveness going beyond to design its validity from an evaluative analysis determined by the Legitimacy Principle, not admitted by Kelsen.References
ATIENZA, Manoel. As razões do direito: teorias da argumentação jurídica. São Paulo: Landy, 2006.
BARZOTTO, Luis Fernando. O positivismo jurídico contemporâneo: uma introdução a Kelsen, Ross e Hart. São Leopoldo: Unisinos, 2003.
BODENHEIMER, Edgar. Ciência do direito. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1966.
BRASIL. Constituição (1988) Constituição da Republica Federativa do Brasil. Disponível em <http://www.planal¬to.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.htm>. Acesso em: 02 fev. 2016.
HANS, Albert. Tratado da razão crítica. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1976.
KELSEN, Hans. Teoria pura do direito. Coimbra: A. Amado, 1979.
KELSEN, Hans. Teoria geral do direito e do Estado. São Paulo: M. Fontes, 1992.
KIRCHMANN, Julio. La jurisprudencia no es ciencia. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Políticos, 1961.
LUHMANN, Niklas. A restituição do décimo segundo camelo: do sentido de uma análise sociológica do direito. In: ARNAUD, André-Jean; LOPES JR., Dalmy (Org.). Niklas Luhmann: do sistema social à sociologia jurídica. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2004. p. 33-107.
MACHADO NETO, Antônio Luís. Teoria da ciência jurídica. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1975.
PEDROSA, Maria Bernardette Neves. Filosofia e direito penal: palestra proferida em 23 de novembro de 1972, na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Fede¬ral da Paraíba – UFPB. Separata da: Revista do Ministério Público de Pernambuco, Recife, ano 01, n. 02, 1972.
PICARD, Edmond. O direito puro. Tradução Afonso Celso Furtado Rezende. Campinas: Romana, 2004.
SOBOTA, Katharina. Não mencione a norma! Tradução de João Maurício Adeodato. Anuário do Mestrado da Faculdade de Direito, Recife, n. 7, p. 251-273, 1995.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright over their work and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows others to share the work with acknowledgement of the work's authorship and its initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
