A interpretação evolutiva da Convenção Americana sobre Direitos Humanos: análise quantitativa e qualitativa do período 1988-2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v17i3.7125Keywords:
Interpretação Evolutiva, Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos, Convenção Americana sobre Direitos Humanos.Abstract
O presente artigo abordará a prática do critério de interpretação evolutiva da Convenção Americana sobre Direitos Humanos na Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. A pesquisa empírica foi feita nos casos contenciosos e nas opiniões consultivas editadas em um período de 30 anos (1988-2018). O texto cria categorias analíticas para avaliação comparativa desse critério interpretativo: 1) Fundamento da evolução; 2) Objeto da evolução; 3) Parâmetro da evolução e 4) Balizas da Interpretação. Argumentamos que mudanças na composição da corte e a consolidação democrática são fatores que explicam a mudança de jurisprudência da corte em 2016, a qual passa a dissociar a proteção mais ampla da pessoa da interpretação evolutiva, binômio que explicava a prática anterior (1999-2016).References
ABRAMOVICH, Víctor. Das violações em massa aos padrões estruturais: novos enfoques e clássicas tensões no sistema interamericano de direitos humanos. Sur, Rev. int. direitos human., São Paulo , v. 6, n. 11, p. 6-39, Dec. 2009.
AGUIRRE ARANGO, José Pedro. La interpretación de la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos. Revista de Derechos Humanos, Guatemala, vol. V, nº 8, p. 73-97, 2007.
ANTKOWIAK, Thomas M; GONZA, Alejandra, The American Convention on Human Rights: essential rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
ARATO, Julian, Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation: Techniques of Treaty Interpretation over Time and Their Diverse Consequences. Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Vol. 9, nº 03, p. 443-494, 2010.
AREVALO NARVAEZ, Carlos Enrique; PATARROYO RAMIREZ, Paola Andrea. Treaties over Time and Human Rights: A Case Law Analysis of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. ACDI, v. 10, p. 295, 2017.
BURGORGUE-LARSEN, Laurence. “Decompartmentalization”: The key technique for interpreting regional human rights treaties. I•CON (2018), Vol. 16 No. 1, 187–213.
BURGORGUE-LARSEN, Laurence. El Contexto, Las Técnicas y Las Consecuencias de la Interpretación de la Convención Americana de los Derechos Humanos. Estudios Constitucionales, Vol.12, nº 01, p. 105-162, 2014.
BURGORGUE-LARSEN, Laurence; UBÉDA DE TORRES, Amaya. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Case Law and Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
CANDIA, Gonzalo. Comparing Diverse Approaches to the Margin of Appreciation: The Case of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Working Paper. (March 9, 2014), p. 01-24, acesso em 01 de Agosto de 2014.
DZEHTSIAROU, K.. European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
DULITZKY, Ariel E. An Inter-American Constitutional Court? The Invention of the Conventionality Control by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 50, nº 01, p. 45-93, 2015.
ENGSTROM & Courtney HILLEBRECHT. Institutional change and the Inter-American Human Rights System. The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol 22, n 9, 1111-1122, 2018.
HARRIS, David. Regional Protection of Human Rights: The Inter-American Achievement. In.: HARRIS, David; LIVINGSTONE, Stephen (eds) The Inter-American System of Human Rights. London: Clarendon Press, 1998, p. 01-30.
HELMERSEN, Sondre Torp. Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: Legality, Semantics and Distinctions. European Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 6, nº 01, p. 127-148, 2013.
JUÁREZ, Karlos Castilla. Lo bueno, lo malo, lo feo y lo deseable en la (s)elección de integrantes de la Comisión y la Corte interamericana de derechos humanos. Iuris Dictio 20, 119-136, 2017.
KILLANDER, Magnus. Interpretação dos tratados regionais de direitos humanos. SUR Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, São Paulo, v. 7, n. 13, dez., 2010, p. 149-175.
LIXINSKI, Lucas. The Consensus Method of Interpretation by the Inter- American Court of Human Rights. Canadian Journal of comparative and contemporary law. V. 03, n. 01, pp. 65-95, 2017.
MACINA, Alan. Avena & Other Mexican Nationals: The Litmus for Lagrand & the Future of Consular Rights in the United States. California Western International Law Journal, Vol. 34, nº 01, p. 115-143, 2003.
MIRANDA DA CRUZ, Paula Baldini. Trackers and Trailblazers: Dynamic Interactions and Institutional Design in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2020, Vol. 11, p. 69–90.
MUNCK, Gerardo L.. Building Democracy . . . Which Democracy? Ideology and Models of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America. Government and Opposition, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 364–393, 2015.
NEGISHI, Yota. Relative authorities: constitutional reasonable resistances against Inter-American Court’s doctrines. Iuris Dictio, Vol 21, 2018, p. 49-61.
NEUMAN, Gerald. Subsidiarity. Import, export, and regional consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The European Journal of International Law, vol. 19, nº 01, p. 101-123, 2008.
PASQUALUCCI, Jo M. International Indigenous Land Rights: A Critique of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Light of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Wisconsin International Law Journal, vol. 27, nº 01, p. 51-98, 2009.
SPANO, Robert. Universality or Diversity of Human Rights? Strasbourg in the Age of Subsidiarity, 14 (3) Human Rights Law Review (2014).
SOLEY, Ximena; STEININGER, Silvia. Parting ways or lashing back? Withdrawals, backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Law in Context.Vol 14, 2018, p. 237–257.
TRINDADE, Antonio Augusto Cançado. Desafios e conquistas do Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanos no início do Século XXI. In: A. P. Cachapuz Medeiros (Org.) Desafios do Direito Internacional Contemporâneo. Brasília: Funag, 2007, p.207-321.
VENTURA ROBLES, Manuel. La legitimidad de los jueces de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos”. Prudentia Iuris, nº 82, 2016, p. 271-86.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright over their work and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows others to share the work with acknowledgement of the work's authorship and its initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
