Brazil’s institutional dissonance and its challenges for the Rio+20 conference

Authors

  • Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau UnB
  • Carlos Henrique Rubens Tomé Silva Federal Senate image/svg+xml
  • Fernanda Viana de Carvalho TNC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v9i3.1889

Keywords:

Rio 20. Mudança do clima. Código Florestal. Diversidade biológica. Dissonância institucional.

Abstract

The first aim of this article is to assess how compatible Brazilian foreign policy and domestic policy related to sustainable development issues are at the very moment the Rio Conference took place. Trachtman, Keohane & Victor, and Hathaway were part of the theoretical framework to analyze two intertwined cases: climate change and the reform of the forest code. The main conclusion is that Brazil is experimenting a period of institutional fragility, notably due to the dissonance between the Legislative and the Executive powers concerning the easy adherence to multilateral environmental agreements and their difficult process to enact the legal rule as a national measure, and finally comply with them. As a consequence, the Brazilian international obligations are not necessarily followed by domestic measures, jeopardizing Brazil’s capacity to honor its international commitments. The originality of this text consists of its interdisciplinary approach between law and international politics considering states and subnational actors.

Author Biography

  • Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau, UnB
    RI

References

ALDY, Joseph; STAVINS, Robert. (Eds). Architectures for

agreement: addressing global climate change in a post-

Kyoto world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University

Press, 2007.

AMORIM, Celso. Brazilian foreign policy under President

Lula (2003-2010): an overview. Revista Brasileira de

Política Internacional, 53 (special edition), p. 214-240,

. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbpi/

v53nspe/v53nspea13.pdf>. Acesso em: 02 maio 2012.

BRASIL. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Comunicação

Nacional Inicial do Brasil à Convenção-Quadro das Nações

Unidas sobre Mudança do Clima. Brasília: MCT, 2004.

BRASIL. Segunda Comunicação Nacional do Brasil à

Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas sobre Mudança

Global do Clima. Brasília: MCT, 2010. Disponível

em: <http://www.mct.gov.br/index.php/content/

view/326751.html>. Acesso em: 2 dez. 2010.

BROWN WEISS, Edith; JACOBSON, H. K. Engaging

countries. Strengthening compliance with international

environmental accords. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.

CARSTEN, H.; SPRINZ, D. F. Measuring the effectiveness

of international environmental regimes. Journal of

Conflict Resolution, v. 45, n. 5, 2000.

CARVALHO, Fernanda. “A posição brasileira nas

negociações internacionais sobre florestas e clima (1997

– 2010), do veto à proposição”. 2010. Tese (Doutorado)-

Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de

Brasília, Brasília, 2010.

CHAYES, A.; CHAYES, A. The new sovereignty:

compliance with international regulatory agreements. 2.

ed., Harvard University Press, 1998.

FUNDO AMAZÔNIA. Disponível em:

amazonia.gov.br>. Acesso em: 28 abr.2012.

HATHAWAY, Oona. Do human rights treaties make a

difference? Disponível em: <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/

papers.cfm?abstract_id=311359>. Acesso em: 12 abr.

KEOHANE, Robert; VICTOR. The regime complex for

climate change: discussion Paper 10-33, 2010. Disponível

em: <http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/Keohane_

Victor_Final_2.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2012.

MACHADO FILHO, Haroldo de Oliveira; POPPE,

Khaled Marcelo. Transferência de tecnologia no âmbito

do regime de mudança do clima, capítulo 23, mudança

do clima no Brasil: aspectos econômicos, sociais e

regulatórios. IPEA, 2011. Disponível em:

ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/livros/livros/

livro_mudancadoclima.pdf./> Acesso em: 02 maio 2012.

PUTNAM, Robert D. Diplomacia e política doméstica: a

lógica dos jogos de dois níveis. Rev. Sociol. Polit. [online],

v. 18, n. 36, p. 147-174, 2010.

SPRINZ, D. F., The Quantitative Analysis of International

Environmental Policy . In: CASES, Numbers, Models:

International relations research methods, D. F. Sprinz,

Y. Wolinsky-Nahmias (Ed.). The University of Michigan

Press, 2004. p. 424.

TRACHTMAN, Joel P. International law and domestic

political coalitions: The grand theory of compliance with

international law. Chicago Journal of International Law,

v. 11, n. 1, Summer 2010. Disponível em:

ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1549337>.

Acesso em: 12 jun. 2012.

VIOLA, Eduardo. O Brasil na arena internacional da

mitigação da mudança climática. Disponível em:

cindesbrasil.org>. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2009.

VIOLA, Eduardo; FRANCHINI, Matias. A mudança

climática em 2011: governança global estagnada e o

novo perfil do Brasil. Textos Cindes nº 25. Disponível em:

<http://www.cindesbrasil.org/site2010/index.php?option

=com_jdownloads&Itemid=14&view=finish&cid=548&

catid=7>. Acesso em : 15 setembro 2012.

Published

2012-11-08

How to Cite

Brazil’s institutional dissonance and its challenges for the Rio+20 conference. (2012). Revista de Direito Internacional, 9(3), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v9i3.1889