Transjudicial interactions and transjudicialism: on the ironic language in international law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v9i4.2121Keywords:
Transjudicialismo. Linguagem irônica. Capitalismo histórico. Judiciário internacional.Abstract
The interactions among national and international courts are expanding pari passu with the expansion of the powers of the judiciary throughout the world-system and the proliferation of the number of international and supranational courts. Taking in consideration that transjudicial interactions configure a complex sociological phenomenon, this study intends to focus on its ethical, political and epistemological aspects. One goal of research is to sustain the intimate relationship between ideas and universal values of Western society, historical capitalism and the (ironic) language of international law, and that such a relationship is in the core foundation of the transjudicialism, defending the paradigm of complexity as the more appropriate theoretical model to analyze the phenomenon. The essay adopts fundamentally a theoretical analysis, which has as its background a critique of the communitarian perspective underlying the transjudicialism, though not rare incursions through judicial precedents will be also made.References
ADDIS, Adeno. Imagining the international community:
the constitutive dimension of universal jurisdiction.
Human Rights Quarterly, v. 31, p. 129-162, 2009.
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. Estado de exceção. Tradução de
Iraci Poleti. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2004.
ANDERSON, Benedict. Comunidades imaginadas:
reflexões sobre a origem e a difusão do nacionalismo.
Tradução de Denise Bottman. São Paulo: Companhia das
Letras, 2008.
BERMAN, Paul Schiff. Judges as cosmopolitan
transnational actors. University of Connecticut School of
Law Articles and Working Papers, v. 38, p. 101-112, 2004.
BRADFORD, Anu; POSNER, Eric A. Universal
exceptionalism in international Law. Public Law and
Legal Theory Working Paper, v. 290, p. 1-53, 2009.
BURGORGUE-LARSEN, Laurence. De l’internationalisation
du dialogue des juges. 2010. p. 95-130 Missive
doctrinale à l’attention de Bruno Genevois. 2010.
BURKE-WHITE, William W. A Community of courts:
toward a system of international criminal Law enforcement.
Michigan Journal of International Law, v. 24, p. 1-101.
BURKE-WHITE, William W. International legal pluralism.
Michigan Journal of International Law, v. 25, p. 963- 979, 2004.
CALLIES, Christian. Europe as transnational Law. The
transnationalization of values by European Law. German
Law Journal, v. 10, n. 10, p. 1367-1382, 2009.
CARON, David D. Towards a political theory of international courts and tribunals. Berkeley Journal of International Law, v. 24, p. 401-423, 2007.
CHANG, Ruth (Ed.). Incommensurability, incomparability and practical reason. Cambridge: Harvard, 1997.
CHARNEY, Jonathan I. The Impact on the international legal system of the growth of international courts and tribunals. International Law and Politics, v. 31, p. 697-708, 1999.
COGAN, Jacob Katz. Competition and control in international adjudication. Virginia Journal of International Law, v. 48, n. 2, p. 411-449, 2008.
COLONOMOS, Ariel. Moralizing international relations. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008.
COOPER, David E. Irony. In: DAVIES, Stephen et al (Ed.). A Companion to aesthetics. 2nd. Ed. Singapore: Willey-Blackwell, 2009.
DROIT, Roger-Pol. O que é Ocidente? Tradução de Inês Dias. Lisboa: Gradiva, 2009.
DUPUY, Pierre-Marie. L’unité de l’ordre juridique nternational: cours général de droit international public. Académie de droit international de la Haye, Recueil des cours, 2002. 279 v.
FACIOLI, Adriano. A Ironia: considerações filosóficas e psicológicas. Curitiba: Juruá, 2010.
FITT, Virginia A. The Tragedy of Comity: questioning the american treatment of inadequate foreign courts. Virginia Journal of International Law, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1021- 1044, 2010.
FURROW, Dwight. Ética. Conceitos-chave em filosofia. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2007.
GLENSY, Rex D. Which Countries count? Lawrence v. Texas and the selection of foreign persuasive authority. Virginia Journal of International Law, v. 45, n. 2, p. 357- 449, 2004.
GUZMAN, Andrew T. How international Law works: rational choice theory. New York: Oxford, 2008.
HAFNER, Gerhard. Pros and cons ensuing from fragmentation of international Law. Michigan Journal of International Law, v. 25, p. 849-863, 2004.
HELFER, Laurence R.; SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. Why states create international tribunals: a response to Professors Posner and Yoo. California Law Review, California, v. 93, p. 1-58, 2005.
HIRSCHMAN, Albert O. Auto-subversão: teorias consagradas em xeque. Tradução de Laura Teixeira Motta. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1996.
HOOKER, Brad. Rule-consenquentialism. In: LAFOLLETTE, Hugh (Ed.). The Blackwell guide to ethical theory. UK: Blackwell, 2000.
KENNEDY, David. One, two, three, many legal orders: legal pluralism and the cosmopolitan dream. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, v. 31, n. 641, p. 641-659, 2007.
KENNEDY, David. Receiving the international. Connecticut Journal of International Law, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-26, 1994.
KIERKEGAARD, S. A. O Conceito de ironia constantemente referido a Sócrates. Tradução de Álvaro Luiz Montenegro. 3. ed. Bragança Paulista: Universitária São Francisco, 2006.
KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. Constitutionalism as mindset: Reflections on Kantian themes about international law and globalization. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, v. 8, n. 1, p. 9-36, 2010.
KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. Hierarchy in International Law,
European Journal of International Law, v. 8, p. 566-582, 1997.
LIMONGI, Fernando. O Novo institucionalismo e os estudos legislativos: a literatura norte-americana recente. Boletim Informativo e Bibliográfico de Ciências Sociais, Rio de Janeiro, n. 37, p. 3-38, 1994.
MAPEL, David R.; NARDIN, Terry (Ed.). Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge, 2002.
MARCH, James G.; OLSEN, Johan P. The New Institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, n. 78, p. 734-49, 1984.
MARINO, M. Irony. In: LAMARQUE, Peter V. (Ed.). Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of language. Oxford: Elsevier, 1997.
MARTÍNEZ ZORRILLA, David. El Pluralismo de Isaiah Berlin frente al relativismo e la inconmensurabilidad. Revista de Estudios Politicos, n. 109, p. 173-199, 2000.
MATTEI, Ugo. A Theory of imperial Law: a study on U.S. hegemony and the Latin resistance. Global Jurist Frontiers, v. 3, n. 2, p. 1-61, 2003.
MICHAELS, Ralf. Two paradigms of jurisdiction. Michigan Journal of International Law, v. 27, p. 1003- 1069, 2007.
MILLER, Nathan. An International jurisprudence? The Operation of “precedent” across international tribunals. Leiden Journal of International Law, v. 15, p. 483-526, 2002.
MILLS, Alex; STEPHENS, Tim. Challenging the role of judges in Slaughter’s liberal theory of international law. Leiden Journal of International Law, UK, v. 18, p. 1-30, 2005.
MORIN, Edgar. Introdução ao pensamento complexo. Tradução de Dulce Matos. 5. ed. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 2008.
MUECKE, D. C. Ironia e irônico. Trad. Geraldo Gerson de Souza. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1995.
PARRISH, Austen L. Storm in a teacup: The U.S. Supreme Court’s use of foreign law. University of Illinois Law Review, v. 2007, n. 2, p. 637-680, 2007.
PAUWELYN, Joost. Bridging fragmentation and unity:
international Law as universe of inter-connected islands.
Michigan Journal of International Law, v. 25, p. 903-916,
PEREIRA, Ruitemberg Nunes. O intuicionismo moral e a ética dos desafios. Direitos fundamentais & Justiça, ano 4, v. 12, p. 203-234, jul./set. 2010.
PETIT, Philip. Consequentialism. In: SINGER, Peter (Ed.). A Companion to ethics. Singapore: Blackwell, 1993.
POSNER, Eric A.; YOO, John C. Judicial independence in international tribunals. California Law Review, California, v. 93, n. 1, p. 1-74, jan. 2005.
RAO, Pemmaraju Sreenivasa. Multiple international judicial forums: a reflection of the growing strength of international Law or its fragmentation? Michigan Journal of International Law, v. 25, p. 929-961, 2004.
Ruitemberg Nunes Pereira REID JR, Charles J. Edward Douglass White’s use of Roman and Canon Law: a study in the Supreme Court’s use of foreign legal citations. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, v. 3, n. 2, p. 281-310, 2005.
ROMANO, Cesare P. R. The Proliferation of international
judicial bodies: the pieces of the puzzle. International Law
and Politics, v. 31, p. 709-751, 1999.
RORTY, Richard. Contingência, ironia e solidariedade. Tradução de Vera Ribeiro. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.
SALERNO, Silvana. Viagem pelo Brasil em 52 histórias. São Paulo: Companhia das Letrinhas, 2006.
SCALIA, Antonin. Common-law courts in a civillaw system: the role of United States federal courts in interpreting the constitutional laws. The Tanner lectures on human values, Princeton, p. 77-121, 1995.
SELL, Carlos Eduardo. Introdução à sociologia política:
política e sociedade na modernidade tardia. Petrópolis,
RJ: Vozes, 2006.
SEN, Amartya. Imparcialidade aberta e fechada. ALCEU:
Revista do Departamento de Comunicação Social da PUCRIO,
Rio de Janeiro, v. 3, n. 6, p. 5-30, jan./jul. 2003.
SHANY, Yuval. No Longer a weak department of Power?
Reflections on the emergence of a New International
Judiciary. European Journal of International Law, v. 20, n.
, p. 73-91, 2009.
SIMMA, Bruno. Universality of international law from
the perspective of a practitioner. European Journal of
International Law, v. 20, n. 2, p. 265-297, 2009.
SIMMEL, Georg. Conflict & The Web of Group-affiliations.
Translated by Kurt H. Wolff and Reinhard Bendix. New
York: The Free Press, 1964.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A Global community of Courts. Harvard International Law Journal, v. 44, n. 1, p. 191-219, 2003.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A New world order. Princeton: Princeton, 2004.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. A Typology of transjudicial communication. University of Richmond Law Review, v. 29, p. 99-137, 1994-1995.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. Court to Court. The American Journal of International Law, v. 92, n. 4, p. 708- 712, 1998.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. International Law in a world of liberal states. European Journal of International Law, v. 6, p. 503-538, 1995.
SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. Judicial globalization. Virginia Journal of International Law, v. 40, p. 1103-1124, 1999-2000.
TERRIS, Daniel; ROMANO, Cesare P. R.; SWIGART,
Leigh. Towards a community of international judges.
Loyola Law School Los Angeles & Comparative Law
Review, v. 30, p. 319-471, 2008.
TEUBNER, Günther. Altera pars audiatur: Law in the
Collision of Discourses. In: RAWLINGS, R. (Ed.). Law,
society and economy. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.
TEUBNER, Gunther. Global Bukowina. Legal pluralism
in the world society. In: TEUBNER, Gunther (Ed.).
Global law without a State. Dartmouth: Aldershot, 1997.
THELEN, Kathleen; STEINMO, Sven. Historical institucionalism in comparative politics. In: STEINMO, Sven; THELEN, Kathleen; LONGSTRETH, Frank (Ed.). Structuring politics. Historical institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge.
TOUFAYAN, Mark. Identity, effectiveness, and newness
in transjudicialism’s coming of age. Michigan Journal of
International Law, v. 31, p. 307-383, 2010.
TUSHNET, Mark. The Inevitable globalization of
constitutional Law. Virginia Journal of International Law,
v. 49, n. 4, p. 985-1006, 2009.
WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel. Capitalismo histórico e
civilização capitalista. Tradução de Renato Aguiar. Rio de
Janeiro: Contraponto, 2001.
WELLENS, Karel. Fragmentation of international
Law and establishing an accountability regime for
international organizations: the role of the judiciary in
closing the gap. Michigan Journal of International Law, v.
, p. 1-23, 2004.
YEH, Jiunn; CHANG, Wen-Chen. The Emergence of
transnational constitutionalism: its features, challenges
and solutions. Penn State International Law Review, v. 27,
n.1, p. 89-124, 2008.
ZARING, David. The use of foreign decision by federal
courts: an empirical analysis. Journal of empirical legal
studies, p. 1-25, 2005.
ŽIŽEK, Slavoj. Arriscar o impossível: conversas com
Žižek. Tradução de Vera Ribeiro. São Paulo: Martins
Fontes, 2006.
ŽIŽEK, Slavoj. En defensa de la intolerancia. Traducción
Javier Eraso Ceballos y Antonio José Antón Fernández.
Madrid: Sequitur, 2008a.
ŽIŽEK, Slavoj. Violência: seis notas à margem. Tradução
de Miguel Serras Pereira. Lisboa: Relógio D’água, 2008b.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Brazilian Journal of International Law de Uniceub est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Fondé(e) sur une œuvre à http://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/
