Investimento estrangeiro: o padrão de tratamento justo e equitativo e o papel da boa-fé
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
ACCIOLY, Hildebrando; SILVA, G. E. do Nascimento
e; CASELLA, Paulo Borba. Manual de direito internacional
público. 17. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2009.
BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL. Investimento estrangeiro
direto. Brasília, 2013. Disponível em:
bc.gov.br/?INVED>. Acesso em: 28 jan. 2013.
BRONFMAN, Marcela Klein. Fair and equitable treatment:
an evolving standard. Max Planck Yearbook of
United Nations Law, Heidelberg, v. 10, p. 609-680, 2006.
CHENG, Tai-Heng, et al. Is the fair and equitable treatment
standard fair and equitable? In: INTERNATIONAL
LAW WEEKEND, 2006, New York. Anais eletrônicos…
New York: Association of the Bar of the City
of New York, 2006. Disponível em:
abstract=1259941>. Acesso em: 25 out. 2012.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION
AND DEVELOPMENT. Fair and equitable treatment standard in
international investment law. Working Papers on International Investment, [Paris], n. 3, p. 24, sep. 2004.
D’AMATO, Anthony. Good faith. In: BERNHARDT,
Rudolf; In: MACALISTER-SMITH, Peter (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1992. v. 2. p. 599-601.
DINH, Nguyen Quoc; DAILLIER, Patrick; PELLET,
Alain. Direito internacional público. Tradução de Vítor Marques
Coelho. 2. ed. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbekian, 2003.
DUMBERRY, Patrick. The quest to define “fair and
equitable treatment” for investors under international
law: the case of the NAFTA chapter 11 Pope & Talbot
awards. Journal of Wolrd Investment, Geneva, v. 3, n. 4, p.
-691, aug. 2002.
FLÜCKIGER, Alexandre. Why do we obey soft law?
In: NAHRATH, Stéphane; VARONE, Frédéric (Ed.).
Rediscovering public law and public administration in comparative
policy analysis: a tribute to Peter Knoepfel. [Lausanne]:
Haupt Verlag, 2009. p. 45-62.
GAMA JÚNIOR, Lauro. Contratos internacionais à luz dos
princípios do UNIDROIT 2004: soft Law, arbitragem e jurisdição.
Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2006.
GARNER, Bryan A. Black’s law dictionary. 8. ed. St. Paul,
MN: West Thomson, 2004.
HENCKELS, Caroline. Proportionality and the standard
of review in fair and equitable treatment claims:
balancing stability and consistency with the public interest.
In: BIENNAL GLOBAL CONFERENCE, 3.,
, Singapore, Anais eletrônicos… London: Society of
Economic Law, 2012. Disponível em:
ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2091474>.
Acesso em: 25 out. 2012.
HILLGENBERG, Hartmut. A fresh look at soft law.
European Journal of International Law, [Florence], v. 10, n.
, p. 499-515, 1999.
INFANTE, Fábio Giorgi. Aplicação da boa-fé na arbitragem
internacional. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito)-
Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de São Paulo, São
Paulo, 2011.
KINGSBURY, Benedict; SCHILL, Stephan W. Investor-State
arbitration as governance: fair and equitable
treatment, proportionality and the emerging global administrative
law. NYU School of Law Public Law and Legal
Theory Research Paper Series, n. 09-46, sep. 2009.
LAFER, Celso. O GATT, a cláusula de nação mais favorecida
e a América Latina. Revista de Direito Mercantil, Industrial,
Econômico e Financeiro, São Paulo, v. 10, n. 3, p. 41-56, 1971.
LERNER, Diego Fraga. Os regimes jurídicos de proteção ao
investimento estrangeiro direto: o papel desempenhado pelos
países emergentes. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito)-
Faculdade de Direito, Universidade Federal do Rio
Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2009.
MANIRUZZAMAN, A. F. M. The concept of good
faith in international investment disputes: the arbitror1s
dilemma. Amicus Curiae: Journal of the Society for Advanced
Legal Studies, London, n. 89, spring, 2012.
MARTINS-COSTA, Judith H. A boa fé no direito privado.
São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2000.
MAYEDA, Graham. Playing fair: the meaning of fair
and equitable treatment in bilateral investments treaties.
Journal of World Trade, v. 41, n. 2, p. 273-291, 2007.
NASSER, Salem Hikmat. Fontes e normas do direito internacional:
um estudo sobre a soft Law. São Paulo: Atlas, 2005.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Fair and equitable treatment standard in international investment law.
Working Papers on International Investment, [Paris], n. 3, sep.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Most-favoured-nation treatment in international investment law. Working Papers on International Investment, [Paris], n. 2, sep. 2004.
PANIZZON, Marion. Good faith, fairness and due
process in WTO dispute settlement practice: overvoming
the positivism of international trade law. Essays
on the Future of the World Trade Organization. Lausanne:
Éditions Interuniversitaires Suisses, v. 2, jan. 2008.
PANIZZON, Marion. Fairness, promptness, and effectiveness:
how the openess of good faith limits the
flexibility of the DSU. Nordic Journal of International Law,
[Leiden], v. 77, n. 3, 2008.
PRATA, Ana. Dicionário jurídico. 5. ed. Coimbra: Almedina,
v. 1.
SACHS, Jeffrey D.; LARRAIN, Felipe B. Macroeconomia.
Tradução de Sara R. Gedanke. São Paulo: Makron Books,
SCHLEE, Paula C. Padrões de tratamento do estrangeiro
e sua propriedade em matéria de investimento:
análise da jurisprudência do ICSID. In: KLOR, Adriana
Dreyzin; ARROYO, Diego P. Fernández; PIMENTEL,
Luiz Otávio (Dir.). Investimento estrangeiro. Florianópolis:
Fundação Boiteux, 2005. p. 82-105.
SILVA, De Plácido. Vocabulário jurídico conciso. 2.ed. Rio
de Janeiro: Forense, 2010.
SORNARAJAH, Muthucumaraswamy. The international
law on foreign investment. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2004.
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE
AND DEVELOPMENT. Fair and equitable treatment:
UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment
Agreements II. New York: United Nations, 2012.
VANDEVELDE, Kenneth J. A unified theory of fair
and equitable treatment. Journal of International Law and
Politics. [New York], v. 43, n. 1, p. 43-106, 2010.
VARELLA, Marcelo D. Direito internacional público. 3.ed.
São Paulo: Saraiva, 2011.
VOIGT, Christina. The role of general principles in
international law and their relationship to treaty law.
Retfærd: Nordic Journal of Law and Justice, [S.l.], v. 31,
n. 121, p. 3-25, 2008.
YOST, Chris. A case review and analysis of the legitimate
expectations principle as it applies within the fair
and equitable treatment standard. Australian National
University College of Law Research Paper, [Canberra], n. 09-
, [2009].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v10i1.2349
ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)