The role of the brazilian court of audit in control of public services delegates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v1i1.1236Abstract
The present article aims to demonstrate the form of action the Brazilian Court of Audit in the control of public delegates. To achieve this objective, was conducted extensive research on the doctrinal term public service, at which one can conclude that there is not unanimity among the lawyer about the matter. The provision of public services that in the early twentieth century was almost entirely supported by the state, gradually transferring to private individuals, through delegation of the former to the latter. Among other factors that led to this transfer, was the need to reduce the size of the state in order to reduce the costs of administrative machinery. So that society was not prejudiced by the provision of public services of low quality, it was necessary to create organisms capable of regulating the relationship between citizens and agents delegates. In our legal system, such a task is in charge of regulatory agencies that perform the primary control over how services are being provided, noting, among other things, whether the public interest being served, and whether the fees charged are consistent with what was agreed upon at the concession made by the State. At the Court of Audit meets the call hold control of second order. Through this control the Court of Auditors is able to check whether the regulatory agencies are fulfilling their legal and constitutional, in order to protect the public interest and ensure the provision of efficient services to citizens. At the end, is necessary to say that this article was not public in any vehicle.References
BANCO MUNDIAL. Private participation in infrastructure: trends in developing countries in 1990-2001: energy, telecomunications, transport, water. Washington: World Bank, 2003.
BIELSA, Rafael. Ciencia de la administracion. Rosario: Universidad Nacional del Litoral, 1937.
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituiçao.htm. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2010.
BRASIL. Instrução Normativa/TCU nº 27, 2 dez. 1998. Dispõe sobre a fiscalização pelo Tribunal de Contas da União dos processos de desestatização. Disponível em: http://www.tcu.gov.br/ Consultas/Juris/Docs/judoc/IN/20090624/INT1998-027.doc. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2010.
CAETANO, Marcello. Princípios fundamentais do direito administrativo. Coimbra: Almedina, 1996.
CARVALHO FILHO, José dos Santos. Manual de direito administrativo. 14. ed., rev. e ampl. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2005.
DROMI, Roberto. Derecho administrativo. 5. ed. Buenos Aires: Ciudad Argentina, 1996.
DUGUIT, Léon. Traité de droit constitutionnel. 2. ed. Paris: Ancienne Librairie Fontemong & Cie, 1923. v. 2.
GROTTI, Dinorá Adelaide Musetti. Teoria dos serviços públicos e sua transformação. In: SUNDFELD, Carlos Ari (Coord.). Direito administrativo econômico. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2002.
JUSTEN, Mônica Spezia. A noção do serviço público no direito europeu. São Paulo: Dialética, 2003.
LA TORRE, Michele. Nozione di diritto amministrativo. Roma: Stamperia Reale di Roma, 1935.
LANDI, Guido; POTENZA, Giuseppe. Manuale de diritto amministrativo. Milano: D. A. Giuffrè, 1963.
MALEZIEUX. Raymond. Manuel de droit administratif. Paris: Cujas, 1954.
MEIRELLES, Hely Lopes. Direito administrativo brasileiro. 25. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2000.
MELLO, Celso Antônio Bandeira de. Curso de direito administrativo. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2006.
TRIBUNAL DE CONTAS DA UNIÃO. Auditoria de natureza operacional. Disponível em: http://portal2.tcu.gov.br/portal/page/portal/TCU/comunidades/programas_governo/historico. Acesso em: 9 fev. 2010.
TRIBUNAL DE CONTAS DA UNIÃO. Acórdão 68/2003-TCU-Plenário. Disponível em: http://contas.tcu.gov.br/portaltextual/MostraDocumento?qn=1&doc=2&dpp=20&p=0. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2010.
TRIBUNAL DE CONTAS DA UNIÃO. Acórdão 102/2007-TCU-Plenário. Disponível em: http://contas.tcu.gov.br/portaltextual/MostraDocumento?qn=2&doc=1&dpp=20&p=0. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2010.
TRIBUNAL DE CONTAS DA UNIÃO. Acórdão 2.154/2007-TCU-Plenário. Disponível em: http://contas.tcu.gov.br/portaltextual/MostraDocumento?qn=3&doc=2&dpp=20&p=0. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2010.
TRIBUNAL DE CONTAS DA UNIÃO. Acórdão 556/2004-TCU-Plenário. Disponível em: http://contas.tcu.gov.br/portaltextual/MostraDocumento?qn=4&doc=2&dpp=20&p=0. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2010.
TRIBUNAL DE CONTAS DA UNIÃO. Acórdão 1.756/2004-TCU-Plenário. Disponível em: http://contas.tcu.gov.br/portaltextual/MostraDocumento?doc=5&p=0&qn=1&templ=default. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2010.
VEDEL, M. Georges. Cours d’institutions administratives. Paris: Les Cours de Droit, 1961-1962.
ZYMLER, Benjamin; ALMEIDA, Guilherme Henrique de La Rocque. O controle externo das concessões de serviços públicos e das parcerias público-privadas. Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2005.
ZYMLER, Benjamin. Direito administrativo e controle. Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2005.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.