Policies on validation of foreign graduate diplomas on Law in Brazil? Challenges for the Brazilian System

Authors

  • Marcelo Dias Varella Programa de Mestrado e Doutorado em Direito. Centro Universitário de Brasília.
  • Martonio Mont’Alverne Barreto Lima Universidade de Fortaleza image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v2i1.1814

Abstract

This paper discusses policies for assessing the equivalence of PhD and SJD degrees studied overseas. Th erefore, the analisys is divided into four parts. First, we present some central aspects of the Brazilian system, used to evaluate diplomas obtained abroad. Second, the evolution of PhD in Argentina, off ered by some institutions well recognized and by others institutions non-recognized. Th ird, the characteristics of courses that served as source of inspiration for the Brazilian system, as France and Germany. Fourth, we off er some arguments on the discussion about the validation of diplomas obtained in a diff erent legal education system, as the US SJD’s.

Author Biographies

  • Marcelo Dias Varella, Programa de Mestrado e Doutorado em Direito. Centro Universitário de Brasília.
    Doutor em Direito pela Universidade de Paris. Pós-Doutor pela George Washington University. Pesquisador do CNPq
  • Martonio Mont’Alverne Barreto Lima, Universidade de Fortaleza
    Professor Titular da Universidade de Fortaleza. Doutor e Pós-Doutor em Direito pela Universidade de Frankfurt/M. Atualmente é o Coordenador de Área de Direito perante a CAPES.

References

BRASIL. Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego. Guia de procedimentos. Disponível em: http://www.mte.gov.br/trab_estrang/Guia_Procedimentos.pdf>. Acesso em 06 maio 2012.

BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. REsp 971962/RS. Segunda Turma. Relator: Ministro Herman Benjamin. Diário de Justiça, Brasília, 25 nov. 2008, DJ 13 mar. 2009.

CAPES. Disponível em: http://www.capes.gov.br/images/stories/download/Livros-PNPG-Volume-IMont.pdfZ. Acesso em: 20 maio 2012.

CNE. Disponível em: http://www.sensu.com.br/upload/data/pces106_07 _reconhecimento_de_titulos.pdf. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2012.

CONEAU. Disponível em: www.coneau.gov.ar/archivos/evaluacion /museosocial.pdf. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2012.

KANT, Immanuel. Der Streit der Fakultäten. Darmstadt: Wissenschaft liche Buchgesellschaft , 1983.

KANT, Immanuel. Zum ewigen Frieden: Ein philosophischer Entwurf. Darmstadt: Wissenschaft liche Buchgesellschaft , 1983.

SENSU. Doutorado em ciências jurídicas. Disponível em: http://www.sensu.com.br/conteudo.php?areaid=11&id=4453. Acesso em: 05 mar. 2012.

UNIVERSIDADE DE BUENOS AIRES. Cursos intensivos para doctorado. Disponível em: http://www.derecho.uba.ar/academica/posgrados/doctorado_brasileno_po.php. Acesso em: 09 mar. 2012.

VARELLA, M. D.; ROESLER, C. Difi culdades de avaliação de publicações na área de Direito. Revista Brasileira de Pós-graduação, Brasília, n. 17, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2012-05-25

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012)

Section

Artigos

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

How to Cite

Policies on validation of foreign graduate diplomas on Law in Brazil? Challenges for the Brazilian System. (2012). Brazilian Journal of Public Policy, 2(1), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v2i1.1814