Legal challenges in international trade of genetically modified food for developing countries: Navigating a fragmented landscape
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v21i3.9688Palabras clave:
genetically modified food, international human rights law, international environmental law, international trade law, sustainable development, developing countriesResumen
Food security, cultural identity, and economic prosperity are inextricably linked to a nation's food systems. The advent of genetically modified (GM) food technologies presents both opportunities and challenges in this complex landscape. This article examines the fragmented legal landscape surrounding international trade of GM food, focusing on the challenges faced by developing nations. We analyze the interplay between international human rights law, international environmental law, and international trade law, highlighting the lack of a unified regulatory framework. Furthermore, we explore the specific challenges faced by developing countries regarding the international trade of GM foods. Finally, we propose potential solutions and argue for the importance of public participation alongside a strengthened promotion of the consumers’ right to information.Referencias
CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE
SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES AGREEMENT
TBT AGREEMENT
VIETNAM’S DECREE 69/2010 ON BIOSAFETY FOR GMOS AND PRODUCTS OF GMOS, DECREE 43/2017 ON GOODS LABELING, AND DECREE 15/2018 GUIDING THE FOOD SAFETY LAW
Appellate Body Report, Japan - Measures Affecting AgriculturalProducts, 14, 84, WT/DS76/AB/R (Feb. 22, 1999).
A. OSTROVSKY, Aaron. The European Commission's Regulations for Genetically Modified Organisms and the Current WTO Dispute - Human Health or Environmental Measures? Why the Deliberate Release Directiveis More Appropriately Adjudicated in the WTO Under the TBT Agreement, 15 COLO. J. INrr'L EN'vr'L L. & POL'Y 209, p.214-15, 2004.
BAUMÜLLER, Heike. Domestic Import Regulations for Genetically Modified Organisms and their Compatibility with WTO Rules; International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), 2003.
C. KENNEDY, Kevin. The GATT-WTO System at Fifty. Wis. INT'L L.J. 421, 1998.
COVELLI, Nick. HOHOTS, Viktor. The Health Regulation of Biotech Foods Under the WTO Agreements. INT'L ECON. L. 773, 2003.
COTTIER, Thomas & OESCH, Matthias. International trade regulation – Law and policy in the WTO, the European Union and the Switzerland – Cases, materials and comments, Staempfli publishers Ltd. Berne, Cameron May Ltd. London, 2005.
DANIEL, Bumblauskas. ARTI, Mann. BRETT, Dugan. JACY, Rittmer. A blockchain use case in food distribution: Do you know where your food has been?. International Journal of Information Management, 2019. p. 52.
DUFOUR, Geneviève. Les OGM à l’OMC : Résumé critique du rapport du Groupe spécial dans l’affaire CE- Porduits biotechnologiques, Revue québécoise de droit international, Hors-série, 2007.
EGGERS, Barbara. MACKENZIE, Ruth. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, Journal of International Economic Law, 2000.
FAO. The Right to Adequate Food. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/FactSheet34en.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2024.
FAO, Food safety, Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0104e/a0104e08.htm. Accessed 28 May 2024.
NEWELL, Peter & DOMINIC, Glover. Business and Biotechnology: Regulation and the Politics of Influence. U. of Sussex Inst. of Dev. Studies, Working Paper No. 192, 2003.
KRISMSKY, Sheldon and GRUBER, Jeremy. The GMO Deception: What You Need to Know About the Food, Corporations, and Government Agencies Putting Our Families and Our Environment at Risk. Skyhorse Publishing. Kindle edition, 2014.
OGUS, Anthony. Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994.
SCOONES, Ian. Science, Policy and Regulation: Challengesfor Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries, U. of Sussex Inst. Of Dev. Studies, WorkingPaper No. 147, 2002.
SINAI, Deutch. Are consumer rights human rights?. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, volume 32(3). p. 537- 578.
SEGERSON, Kathleen (1999). Mandatory vs. Voluntary Approaches to Food Safety, Agribusiness 15 (1).
TERENCE, Stewart. DAVID, Johanson, A Nexus of Trade and the Environ- ment: The RelationshipBetween the CartagenaProtocolon Biosafety and the SPS Agreement of the World Trade Organization, Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, Vol.
UNITED NATION SECRETARIAT. UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights. Accessed 28 May 2024.
U.S. Dep't of State, Bureau of Oceans & Int'l Envtl.& Scientific Affairs, Fact Sheet. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, July 21. 2003. Available at: http://www.fas.usda.gov/info/ factsheets/biosafety.asp. Accessed 28 May 2024.
UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT, RESOLUTIONS ADAPTED BY THE CONFERENCE, PRINCIPLE 15. U.N. Doc. A/CONF. 151/26/Rev. I (Vol. 1), Dec. 1, 1992.
VARTIKA, Mathur. LAMIS, Javid. SAMARTH, Kulshrestha. AAKASH, Mandal. A AMARENDER, Reddy. World Cultivation of Genetically Modified Crops: Opportunities and Risks. In: LICHTFOUSE, Eric. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 13. Springer International Publishing. Cham, Switzerland, 2017, p. 45–87.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. THE DECLARATION OF ALMA-ATA IN REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRIMARY HEALTH CARE. Geneva, 1978.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Brazilian Journal of International Law de Uniceub est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Fondé(e) sur une œuvre à http://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/
