The European Court of Human Rights Decision on the ´Burqa Ban´ and the critical analysis of the Pragmatic experimental logic

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v17i1.5889

Palavras-chave:

European Court, Experimental Logic, Human Rights, Philosophical Pragmatism, Legal Pragmatism.

Resumo

The pragmatic philosophy of J. Dewey and C. S. Peirce, associated with the legal realism of Holmes, were used in the present study as a methodological instrument to critically analyze the decision of the European Court of Human Rights, ruling upholding the French ban on the wearing in public of any piece of clothing designed to fully conceal the face (case of S.A.S. v. France, judgment delivered on 1 July 2014).

Biografia do Autor

  • Flavianne Fernanda Bitencourt Nóbrega, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
    Professora Adjunta de Teoria Política e do Estado do Departamento de Direito Público Geral e Processual - Faculdade de Direito - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE). Doutora em Direito pela UFPE, com período sanduíche na Bucerius Law School. Pesquisadora visitante do Instituto Max Planck de Direito Privado e Comparado de Hamburgo. Mestre em Ciência Política e em Direito pela UFPE. Bacharel em Direito.
  • George Browne Rego, Emeritus Professor of the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Professor of the Faculdade Damas
    PhD in Philosophy at Tulane University Law School: New Orleans, LA (1976), Master in Arts at Vanderbilt University Peabody College of Education and Human Development Nashville (1971); Post-graduation in Sociology of Law at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (1967); Bachelor in Philosophy at Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (1966); Bachelor in Law at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (1962).

Referências

DEWEY, John. A Common Faith. Yale University Press, 1991

DEWEY, John. Democracy and Human Nature. In: Freedom and Culture. G.P. Putnam's Sons, New York, 1939

DEWEY, John. Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi, New York, 1938, p.44/5

DEWEY, John. Experience, Knowledge and Values. In: The Life of the Living Philosophers : The Philosophy of John Dewey. Edited by Paul A. Schilpp, Vol. I, Open Court Pu. Illinois, 1971

DEWEY, John. From Absolutism to Experimentalism. In: The Later Works. Vol. 5. 1929-1930. Ed. by Jo Ann Boydston. Southern Illinois University, 1984

DEWEY, John. From Absolutism to Experimentalism. Apud. RUSSEL, Bertrand. Dewey’s New Logic. In: The Library of Living Philosophers: The Philosophy of John Dewey. Ed. Paul A. Schilpp. Illionois Univerisity, 1971

DEWEY, John. Logical Method and Law, The Philosophical Review , Vol. 33, N. 3, 1924.

DEWEY, John. The Public and its Problems. Gateway Books: Chicago, 1946

DEWEY, John. The Quest for Certainty. Gifford Lectures, New York, 1929

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. S.A.S. v. France Judgment. Strasbourg, July 1, 2014. p. 1-67.

HOLMES Jr., Oliver W. The Common Law. University of Toronto Law School, Toronto, 2011.

HOLMES Jr., Oliver Wendell. The Path of Law. In: The Holmes Reader. Julius Marke. Ocean Publications: New York, 1955.

KELLOGG, Frederic R. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Legal Theory, and Judicial Restraint. Cambridge University Press, 2007

JUST, Gustavo. Interpretative Choices and Objectivity-Oriented Legal Discourse: A Strategic Analysis of the ECtHR Ruling on the French Face Veil Ban. Int J Semiot Law, 2015. p. 1-18. DOI 10.1007/s11196-015-9443-8

PEIRCE, Charles S. Pragmatism and Abduction. Collected Papers. Vol. V. Ed. Artur Burks. Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 1934

PEIRCE, Charles S. How to Make our Ideas Clear. In: Selected Writings (Values in an Universe of Chance). Edited by Philip P. Wiener, Dover Publications Inc. New York, 1958

PEIRCE, Charles S. Synechism, Fallibilism, and Evolution. In: Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Edited by Justus Buchler, Dover Publication Inc. New York, 1955

PEIRCE, Charles S. Some Consequences of Four Incapacities. Collected Papers. Vol. V. Cambridge : Harvard University Press. 1934.

Downloads

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2020-07-03

Edição

v. 17 n. 1 (2020): O direito comparado e seus protagonistas: qual uso, para qual fim, com quais métodos?

Seção

Artigos sobre outros temas

Licença

Licence Creative Commons
Brazilian Journal of International Law de Uniceub est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Fondé(e) sur une œuvre à http://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/

Como Citar

The European Court of Human Rights Decision on the ´Burqa Ban´ and the critical analysis of the Pragmatic experimental logic. (2020). Revista de Direito Internacional, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v17i1.5889