Dual nationality and International Law in times of globalization. Challenges and opportunities for consular assistance and diplomatic protection in recent cases

Walter Arevalo-Ramirez, Robert Joseph Blaise Maclean

Resumen


This article studies the interaction of nationality and international law as it may apply to individuals caught in international disputes between states of which they are nationals. The objective of the article is to examine this problem through the lens of the figures of Consular Assistance and Diplomatic Protection. Regarding the methodology, the paper will be elaborated within the following structure. Part 1 will deal with the general concept of nationality at international law. Part 2 will examine “Consular Assistance”, its source, function and application. Part 3 will examine a separate and distinct facet of international law called “Diplomatic Protection” (as distinguished from “Diplomatic Immunity”) and its application to the protection of nationals as well as its weaknesses. Part 4, which develops the original value of this contribution, consist of an analysis of these particular protective measures within the context of particular cases so as to illustrate the weaknesses of these figures as protective of individuals, the limits of nationality as a shield for individuals caught up in international disputes and the almost “second-class” nature of dual nationality from an international law perspective. Part 5 as a conclusion will include some observations as to how states may improve the protections they can afford to their nationals abroad.

Palabras clave


nationality, effective nationality, dual national, globalization, citizenship, jus sanguinis, jus soli, consular assistance, diplomatic protection

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


AUDIT, Mathias., “La coexistence de procédures contentieuses en matière d’investissements étrangers”, Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional (ACDI), 2017, 10, pp. 333-370.

BROWNLIE, Ian. Principles of Public International Law 6th ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003

CÓRDOVA, Roberto, “Report on Multiple Nationality” U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/83, para. 8

DUGARD, John R. First Report on Diplomatic Protection UN Doc. A/CN. 4/506, 7 Mar. 2000 (hereinafter “First Report”) and published in The Report of the 52nd Session of the International Law Commission (2000) U.N. Doc. A/55/10

FORCESE, Craig, “The Obligation To Protect: The Legal Context For Diplomatic Protection of Canadians Abroad”, (2007) 57 University of New Brunswick Law Journal. 102.

KÄLIN, Christian H. "Key Contours of Citizenship and Ius Doni." Ius Doni in International Law and EU Law. Brill Nijhoff, 2019. 17-58.

KETTNER, James. “Subjects or Citizens? A Note on British Views Respecting the Legal Effects of American Independence”, (1976), 62 Va. L. Rev 945. p. 947.

KRAKAT, Michael B. "Genuine Links Beyond State and Market Control: The Sale of Citizenship by Investment in International and Supranational Legal Perspective." Bond Law Review 30 (2018): 145.

LEIGH, Guy I. F. “Nationality and Diplomatic Protection” 20 Int’l and Comp. L. Q 453 (1971) at p. 456. cf.

DUCHESNE, Matthew S. “The Continuous-Nationality-of-Claims Principle: Its Historical Development and Current Relevance to Investor-State Investment Disputes” 36 Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev 783 (2004)

LIGABO, Ambeyi, Special Rapporteur, U.N. High Commission on Human Rights on the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Report on Mission to the Islamic Republic of Iran 12 January 2004 U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/62/Add 2, Para. 74.

LILLICH, Richard B, BEDERMAN, David J., “Jurisprudence of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission: Iran Claims” (1997), 91 AJIL 436 at p. 436.

MACLEAN, R.J. Blaise, “Fresh Hay from Old Fields : the Continuing Usefulness of Diplomatic Protection”, in Ricardo Abello Galvis (ed.), Derecho Internacional Contemporáneo : lo público, lo privado, los derechos humanos : liberr amicorum en homenaje a Germán Cavelier, (Ed. Universidad del Rosario, 2006) pp. 230-246

MACLEAN, Robert Joseph-Blaise, AREVALO, Walter. "The Expulsion of Resident Colombian Nationals during the Colombia-Venezuela Border Dispute: An “Under the Radar: Case for Diplomatic Protection of Human Rights?." Vniversitas 68.138 (2019).

MARTIN, David. “New Rules on Dual Nationality for a Democratizing Globe: Between Rejection and Embrace” (1999 – 2000) 14 Geo. Imm. L.J.1

MCGARVEY-ROSENDAHL, Patricia, “A New Approach to Dual Nationality”, (1985-1986) 8 Hous. J. Int. L. 305 at p. 305.

MUCHMORE, Adam I. “Passports and Nationality in International Law”, (2003-2004) U.C. Davis J Int’l. L. and Pol’y 301, at p. 316

RUBENSTEIN, Kim, ADLER, Daniel, “International Citizenship: The Future of Nationality in a Globalized World”, (1999-2000) 7 Ind. Global Legal Stud. 519

RUSSELL, Franklin. “Dual Nationality in Practice-Some Bizarre Results” (1969-1970) 4 Int’l Lawyer 756.

SCOTT, Michael. “Iran – United Status Claims Tribunal: Decision in Case A/18 Concerning the Question of Jurisdiction Over Claims of Persons with Dual Nationality” (Note) (1985) 26 Harv. Int’l L.J.208.

SPIRO, Peter. “Dual Nationality and the Meaning of Citizenship” (1997) 46 Emory Law Journal. 1411

WARBRICK, Colin. “Diplomatic Representations and Diplomatic Protection”, [2000] 51 ICLQ 723

ZVONKO R. Rode, “Dual Nationals and the Doctrine of Dominant Nationality”, (1959) 53 A.J.I.L. (No. 1) 139.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v17i2.6451

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia