Autonomía administrativa sin autonomía política. La aplicación del modelo “un país dos sistemas” en Hong Kong.

Juan Enrique Serrano Moreno

Resumo


Este estudio analiza la aplicación del modelo “un país dos sistemas” en Hong Kong surgido en las negociones sino-británicas para la devolución del territorio a China a la luz de la jurisprudencia constitucional y los conflictos políticos. La Región Administrativa Especial de la Hong Kong posee una alta autonomía administrativa y cuenta con un sistema político propio basado en el Estado de derecho, elecciones, protección de los derechos fundamentales etc. Sin embargo, la democratización de las instituciones ha sido limitada por el gobierno central que ha obstaculizado la prometida extensión del sufragio universal y más recientemente ha instaurado un filtro ideológico a los candidatos a elecciones en Hong Kong. Este estudio sostiene que la autonomía administrativa de la región no está acompañada por una autonomía política efectiva, situación que favorece el rechazo a una mayor integración de Hong Kong en China continental. El modelo de “un país dos sistemas” pensado en su origen como una democracia limitada ha pasado ha convertirse en un régimen autoritario liberal.

Palavras-chave


Autonomía administrativa, China, Hong Kong, democracia

Texto completo:

PDF (Español (España))

Referências


CASTELLS, Manuel. Redes de indignacion y esperanza: Los movimientos sociales en la era de Internet. Madrid: Alizanza Editorial, 2013.

CHAN, Elaine; CHAN, Joseph. Hong Kong 2007-2017: a backlash in civil society. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, v.39, n.2, p. 135-152, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2017.1325637

CHAN, Johannes M. M.; FU, Hualing; GHAI, Yash. Hong Kong’s Constitutional Debate: Conflict Over Interpretation. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2000.

CHAN, Johannes. A storm of unprecedented ferocity: The shrinking space of the right to political participation, peaceful demonstration, and judicial independence in Hong Kong. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v.16, n.2, p. 373-388, 2018. DOI 10.1093/icon/moy053.

CHEN, Albert H. Y. The Theory, Constitution and Practice of Autonomy: The Case of Hong Kong. In: OLIVIERA, Jorge Costa y CARDINAL, Paulo (edits.), One Country, Two Systems, Three Legal Orders. Perspectives of Evolution. Berlín: Springer, 2009.

CHEN, Albert H. Y. The Rule of Law Under “One Country, Two Systems”: The Case of Hong Kong 1997-2009. 2009. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1474748. Accessed 06.04.2020.

CHEN, Albert H. Y. “A Perfect Storm”. 2019. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/a-perfect-storm/. Accessed 06.04.2020.

CHENG, Edmund W.; CHAN, Wai-Yin. Explaining spontaneous occupation: antecedents, contingencies and spaces in the Umbrella Movement. Social Movement Studies, v.16, n.2, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1252667.

CHENG, Edmund W.; YUEN, Samson. “Memory in movement: collective identity and memory contestation in Hong Kong’s Tiananmen vigils”, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, v.24, n.4, p. 419-437, 2019. DOI 10.17813/1086-671X-24-4-419.

CHENG, Joseph Yu-shek. The Emergence of Radical Politics in Hong Kong: Causes and Impact. China Review. v.14, n.1, p. 199-232, 2014.

DENG, Xiaoping 2004. Deng Xiaoping on “One Country, Two Systems”. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing, 2004, p. 75-6.

FAIRBANK, John K.; GOLDMAN, Merle. China: a new history. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard Press. 2006.

FONG, Brian. C. H. One Country, Two Nationalisms: Center-Periphery Relations between Mainland China and Hong Kong, 1997–2016. Modern China, v.43, n.5, p. 523-556, 2017.

HENDERS, Susan. Territoriality, Asymmetry, and Autonomy. Catalonia, Corsica, Hong Kong, and Tibet. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2010.

HUNG, Ho-fung; IP, Iam-chong. Hong Kong’s Democratic Movement and the Making of China’s Offshore Civil Society. Asian Survey, v.52, n.3, p. 504-527, 2012. DOI 10.1525/as.2012.52.3.504.

MA, Ngok. The rise of “anti-China” sentiments in Hong Kong and the 2012 Legislative Council elections. China Review, v.15, n.1, p. 39-66, 2015.

LAM, Jermain T. M. Party institutionalization in Hong Kong. Asian Perspective. v.34, n.2, p. 53-82, 2010.

LAM, Wai-man; LUI, Percy Luen-tim; WONG, Wilson; HOLLIDAY, Ian. Contemporary Hong Kong Politics: Governance in the Post-1997 Era. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2007.

LIN, Feng. Constitutional Law in China. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010.

LIN, Feng. The Duty of Hong Kong Courts to Follow the NPCSC’s Interpretation of the Basic Law: Are There Any Limits? Hong Kong Law Journal, v.48, n.1, p. 167-191, 2018.

LO, Sonny Shiu-Hing; HUNG, Steven Chung-Fung ; LOO, Jeff Hai-Chi (eds). China’s New United Front Work in Hong Kong. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.

LO, Sonny Shiu-Hing. The Dynamics of Beijing-Hong Kong Relations: A Model for Taiwan? Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2008.

LO, Sonny Shiu-Hing. Hong Kong’s Indigenous Democracy: Origins, Evolution and Contentions. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

RAMÓN-BERJANO, Carola B.; XIAOBIN, Simon Zhao; MING, Chan Ying. “Hong Kong’s Transformation into a Service Hub. Asian Survey, v.51, n.4, p. 584-609, 2011.

SCOTT, Ian. “One country, two systems”: the end of a legitimating ideology? Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, vol.39, n.2, p. 83-99, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2017.1325619

STEINHARDT, H. Christoph; LI, Linda Chelan; JIANG, Yihong. The Identity Shift in Hong Kong since 1997: Measurement and Explanation. Journal of Contemporary China, vol.27, n.110, p. 261-276, 2018. DOI 10.1080/10670564.2018.1389030

SUMMERS, Tim. China’s Hong Kong. Newcastle: Agenda Publishing, 2019.

YUEN, Samson; CHUNG, Sanho. Explaining Localism in Post-handover Hong Kong: An Eventful Approach. China Perspectives, vol.1, n.3, pp. 19-29, 2018. DOI 10.4000/chinaperspectives.8044.

ZHU, Han y CHEN, Albert H. Y. The Oath-Taking Cases and the NPCSC Interpretation of 2016: Interface of Common Law and Chinese Law. Hong Kong Law Journal, vol.49, n.1, p. 381-415, 2019.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v17i2.6638

ISSN 2236-997X (impresso) - ISSN 2237-1036 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia