A natureza econômica do direito e dos tribunais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v9i3.5988Palavras-chave:
Congestionamento Judicial, Teoria Jurídica, Natureza do direito, Natureza dos tribunais, Tragédia do JudiciárioResumo
Este artigo explora a natureza econômica do direito e dos tribunais como uma explicação para o problema endêmico de congestionamento judicial. A teoria econômica de bens e serviços é usada para demonstrar que o direito como coerção é um bem de clube, os tribu-nais são bens privados e ambos são bens complementares. Esses resultados são usados para mostrar que as políticas tradicionais de acesso irrestrito à justiça transformam a natureza econômica dos tribunais de bem privado em recurso comum o que gera congestionamento. Tal congestionamento natural decorrente do livre acesso ao sistema pode levar à negativa de acesso efetivo aos direitos, a Tragédia do Judiciário.Referências
Alexy, Robert. Conceito e Validade do Direito. Tradução: Gercélia Batista de Oliveira Mendes. São Paulo: wmfmartins fontes, 2011 [2005].
Armor, David A., e Shelley E. Taylor. “Situated Optimism: specific outcome expectancies and self-regulation.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1998: 309-379.
Austin, John. The province of jurisprudence determined. Edição: Wilfrid E. Rumble. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995 [1832].
Bar-Gill, Oren. “The Evolution and Persistence of Optimism in Litigation.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 8 de Oct. de 2006: 490-507.
Beier, Martin D. “Economics Awry: Using Access Fees for Caseload Diversion.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Apr. de 1990: 1175-1207.
Beim, Deborah, Tom S. Clark, e John W. Patty. “Why Do Courts Delay?” Journal of Law and Courts, Fall de 2017: 199-241.
Benson, Bruce L. The Enterprise of Law: justice without the state. Oakland, California: The Independent Institute, 2011 [1990].
Bielen, Samantha, Ludo Peeters, Wim Marneffe, e Lode Vereeck. “Backlogs and Litigation Rates: Testing Congestion Equilibrium Across European Judiciaries.” International Review of Law & Economics, September de 2018: 9-22.
Buchanam, James M. “An Economic Theory of Clubs.” Economica, New Series, Feb. de 1965: 1-14.
Buchanan, James M. The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Vol. 7. 20 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2000 [1975].
Burbano, Carolina Villadiego. “Bases Generales para una Reforma a la Justicia Civil en América Latina y el Caribe.” Justice Studies Center of the Americas, 2009.
Burger, J. M., e L. Burns. “The illusion of unique invulnerability and the use of effective contraception.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1988: 264-270.
Buscaglia, Edgardo, e Maria Dakolias. Judicial reform in Latin American courts: the experience in Argentina and Ecuador. The World Bank TEchnical Paper nº 350, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1996.
Capelleti, Mauro, e Bryant G. Garth. “Access to Justice: The Newest Wave in the Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective.” Buffalo Law Review, 1978: 181-292.
Carvalho, Cristiano. Teoria da Decisão Tributária. Lisboa: Almedina, 2018.
CJF; Centro de Estudos Judiciários. Diagnóstico da estrutura e funcionamento dos Juizados Especiais. Edição: Secretaria de Pesquisa e Informação Jurídicas. Vol. 12. Brasília, DF: Conselho da Justiça Federal, 2003.
Clemenz, Gerhard, e Klaus Gugler. “Macroeconomic Development and Civil Litigation.” European Journal of Law and Economics, 2000: 215-230.
Coase, Ronald H. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics, October de 1960: 1-44.
Cooter, Robert D. “Structural Adjudication and the New Law Merchant: a model of decentralized law.” International Review of Law and Economics, 1994: 215-231.
Cornes, Richard, e Todd Sandler. The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1999 [1996].
Cowen, Tyler. “Law as a Public Good: The Economics of Anarchy.” Economics & Philosophy, Oct. de 1992: 249-267.
Dakolias, Maria. Court Performance around the World: a comparative perspective. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications, 1999.
D'Amato, Anthony. “Legal Uncertainty.” California Law Review, 1983: 1-55.
Danzon, Patricia Munch, e Lee A. Lillard. “Settlement out of Court: The Disposition of Medical Malpractice Claims.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Jun. de 1983: 345-377.
Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe, e Bruno Deffains. “Uncertainty of Law and the Legal Process.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 24 de December de 2007: 627-656.
Di Vita, Giuseppe. “Production of laws and delays in court decisions.” International Review of Law and Economics, 2010: 276-281.
Dixit, Avinash K. Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance. 1ª. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
Djankov, Simeon, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, e Andrei Shleifer. “Courts.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1 de May de 2003: 453-517.
Durkheim, Emile. As Regras do Método Sociológico. 10ª. Tradução: Maria Isaura Pereira de Queiroz. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1982 [1895].
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. 5th. Massachusetss: Harvard University Press, 1977.
Ehrlich, Isaac, e Richard A. Posner. “An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Janeiro de 1974: 257-286.
Einstein, Albert, e Leopold Infeld. The Evolution of Physics: The Growth of Ideas from the Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta. London: Cambridge University Press, 1938.
European Commission. The 2018 EU Justice Scoreboard . Communication COM(2018) 364 final, European Commission, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018.
Euzébio, Gilson Luiz. DPJ traçará diagnóstico dos Juizados Especiais. Edição: Agência CNJ de Notícias. 20 de 3 de 2012. http://www.cnj.jus.br/noticias/cnj/18646:dpj-tracara-diagnostico-dos-juizados-especiais (acesso em 12 de 8 de 2012).
Fallers, Lloyd A. Law Wihtout Preedent: legal ideias in action in the courts of colonial Busoga. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1969.
Figueira Junior, Joel Dias, e Mauricio Antonio Ribeiro Lopes. Comentários à Lei dos Juizados Especiais Cíveis e Criminais. 2ª ed. rev. São Paulo, SP: Revista dos Tribunais, 1997.
Fix-Fierro, Héctor. Courts, Justice and Efficiency: a socio-legal study of economic rationality in adjudication. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2003.
Friedmann, David. “Private CReation and Enforcement of Law: a Historical Case.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Mar. de 1979: 399-415.
Garner, Bryan A., ed. Black's Law Dictionary . 7th. St. Paul, Minn: West Group, 1999.
Gico Jr., Ivo Teixeira. “Anarquismo Judicial e Teoria dos Times.” Edição: ABDE e UCB. Economic Analysis of Law Review (Universa) 4, nº 2 (Jul-Dez 2013): 269-294.
Gico Jr., Ivo Teixeira. “O capital jurídico e o ciclo da litigância.” Revista Direito GV 9 (jul./dez. 2013): 435-464.
Gico Jr., Ivo Teixeira. “Anarquismo Judicial e Segurança Jurídica.” Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, 2015, Número Especial ed.: 479-499.
Gico Jr., Ivo Teixeira. “A Tragédia do Judiciário.” Revista de Direito Administrativo, 2014: 163-198.
Gico Jr., Ivo Teixeira. “Hermenêutica das Escolhas e a Função Legislativa do Judiciário.” Revista de Direito Empresarial - RDemp, maio/ago. de 2018, 15 ed.: 55-84.
Ginsburg, Tom, e Glenn Hoetker. “The Unreluctant Litigant? An Empirical Analysis of Japan's Turn to Litigation.” Journal of Legal Studies, Jan de 2006: 31-59.
Gould, John P. “The Economics of Legal Conflicts.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Junho de 1973: 279-300.
Gravelle, H.S.E. “Rationing trials by waiting: Welfare implications.” International Review of Law and Economics, December de 1990: 255-270.
Greif, Avner. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Hardin, Garrett. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science, 13 de Dez. de 1968: 1.243-1.248.
Hargis, Thomas F. “The Law's Delay.” The North American Review, Apr. de 1885, 341 ed.: 309-315.
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 3rd. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [1961].
Hazard, Jr, Geoffrey C. “Rationing Justice.” The Journal of Law & Economics, Oct. de 1965: 1-10.
Holmes Jr., Oliver Wendell. “The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review, 25 de Mar. de 1897: 457-478.
Kahneman, Daniel, e Amos Tversky. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist, April de 1984: 341-350.
Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law. Tradução: Max Knight. Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2005 [1967].
Landes, William M. “An Economic Analysis of the Courts.” Journal of Law and Economics, Abril de 1971: 61-107.
Landes, William M., e Richard A. Posner. “Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” NBER Working Paper Series, Agosto de 1976: 1-69.
Landes, William M., e Richard A. Posner. “Adjudication as a Private Good.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Mar. de 1979, Private Alternatives to the Judicial Process ed.: 235-284.
Lee, Yoon-Ho Alex, e Daniel Klerman. “The Priest-Klein hypothesis: Proofs and generality.” International Review of Law and Economics, 1st de July de 2016: 59-76.
MacCormick, Neil. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Marchesi, Daniela. Litiganti, avvocati e magistrati. Diritto ed economia del processo civile. Studi e Ricerche. Il Mulino, 2003.
Martins, Pedro. Historia Geral do Direito Romano, Peninsular e Português. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade, 1906.
Mas-Collel, Andreu, Michal D. Whiston, e Jerry R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
McAdams, Richard H. The Expressive Powers of Law: theories and limits. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2017.
McKenna, Frank P., Robert A. Stanier, e Clive Lewis. “Factors underlying illusory self-assessment of driving skill in males and females.” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Feb. de 1991: 45-52.
Messick, Richard E. “Judicial Reform and Economic Development: A Survey of the Issues.” The World Bank Research Observer, Fev. de 1999: 117-136.
Michlowski, Piotr, e C.B.F. Walker. A New Sumerian "Law Code". Vol. Occasional Publications of the Samuel Noah Kramer Fund, em Dumu-e2-dub-ba-a: Studies in Honor of Åke W. Sjöberg, edição: Hermann Behrens, Darlene Loding e Martha T. Roth, 383-396. Philadelphia: The University Museum, 1989.
Moncada, Luís Cabral de. Elementos de História do Direito Romano. Vols. II - Parte Geral: teoria geral da relaçao jurídica. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1924.
Mousourakis, George. Roman Law and the Origins of the Civil Law Tradition. Auckland: Springer, 2015.
Mueller, Dennis C. Public Choice III. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [2005].
Musgrave, Richard A. The Theory of Public Finance: a study in public economy. Bombay: Tata-McGraw-Hil Book Company, 1959.
NCJRS. Task Force Report: The Courts . Task Force on the Administration of Justice, Washington: The U.S. Pres. Comm'n on Law Enforcement and Admin. of Justice, 1967.
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971 [1965].
Ostrom. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 [1990].
Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner, e James Walker. Rules, Games & Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1994.
Ostrom, Vincent, e Elinor Ostrom. Public Goods and Public Choices. Vol. 2, em Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, edição: Michael Dean McGinnis, 75-103. University of Michigan Pres, 1999 [1977].
Parisi, Francesco. “The Efficiency of the Common Law Hypothesis.” Em The Encyclopedia of Public Choice , por Schneider F. Rowley C.K., 519-522. Boston, MA: Springer, 2004.
Parker, Christine. Just Lawyers: Regulation and Access to Jusitce. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Pellegrina, Lucia Dalla. “Court delays and crime deterrence: An application to crimes against property in Italy.” European Journal of Law & Economics, 30 de September de 2008: 267-290.
Perrin, Benjamin, e Richard Audas. Report Card on the Criminal Justice System: Evaluating Canada's Justice Deficit. Report Card , Ottawa: MacDonald-Laurier Institute, 2016.
Planiol, Marcel. Traité Élémentaire de Droit Civil. 3ª. Vol. Tome Premier. 3 vols. Paris: F. Pichon, Duccesseur, Éditeur, 1904.
Posner, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law. 7th. New York, N.Y.: Aspen Publishers, 2007.
Posner, Richard A. “What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does).” Supreme Court Economic Review, 1993: 1-41.
Posner, Richard A. The Federal Courts: challenge and reform. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Posner, Richard A. “An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Junho de 1973: 399-458.
Priest, George L. “Private Litigants and the Court Congestion Problem.” Boston University Law Review, 1989: 527-559.
Priest, George L. “Measuring Legal Change.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, Outono de 1987: 193-225.
Priest, George L., e Benjamin Klein. “The Selection of Disputes for Litigation.” Journal of Legal Studies, January de 1984: 1-55.
Qazi, Asher A. “Suo Motu: Choosing Not to Legislate.” Em Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court, por Moeen H. Cheema e Ijaz S. Gilani. Islamabad: Oxford University Press , 2015.
Raz, Joseph. The Concept of a Legal System: an introduction to the Theory of Legal System. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997 [1980].
Riggsby, Andrew M. Roman Law and the Legal World of the Romans. 1st. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Ross, H. Laurence. Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustment. Revised 2nd . Howthorne, N.Y.: Aldine Publishing, 1980.
Roth, Martha Tobi . Law collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor. 2ª. Edição: Piotr Michalowski. Vol. 6. Atlanta, Georgia: Society of Biblical Studies, 1997.
Samuelson, Paul A. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Nov. de 1954: 387-389.
Schauer, Frederick. The Force of Law. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2015.
Schelling, Thomas C. The Strategy of Conflict: with a new Preface by the Author. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981 [1960].
Secretaria de Reforma do Judiciário. Juizados Especiais Cíveis: estudo. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Justiça, 2005.
Shapiro, Martin. Courts, a comparative and political analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1981.
Shavell, Steven. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University, 2004.
Stiglitz, Joseph E., e Jay K. Rosengard. Economics of the Public Sector. 4th. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2015.
The Scotish Government. Making Justice Work: Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill – A Consultation Paper. Consultation Paper, Edinburgh: APS Group Scotland, 2013.
United Nations. United Nations and the Rule of Law. s.d. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/thematic-areas/access-to-justice-and-rule-of-law-institutions/access-to-justice/ (acesso em 22nd de June de 2018).
Van Rhee, C.H. (Remco), e Fu Yulin, . Civil Litigation in China and Europe: Essays on the Role of the Judge and the Parties. Vol. 31. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.
Vereeck, Lode, e Manuela Mühl. “An Economic Theory of Court Delay.” European Journal of Law and Economics, 2000: 243-268.
Weber, Max. Economia e sociedade: fundamentos da sociologia compreensiva . Tradução: Regis Barbosa e Karen Elsabe Barbosa. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Brasília, DF: Universidade de Brasília, 1999 [1920].
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
“Eu XXXX declaro que em caso de aceitação do artigo inédito, a Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas passa a ter os direitos autorais a ele referentes sendo vedada qualquer reprodução total ou parcial, em qualquer outro meio de divulgação impresso ou eletrônico. Em caso de necessidade, autorização prévia deverá ser solicitada por escrito junto ao Editor-gerente da RBPP”.
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas do UniCEUB está licenciada sob uma LICENÇA CREATIVE COMMONS licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
http://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/
