Os vieses da biodiversidade apresentados pelo caso do parque eólico de Bald Hills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v13i2.4063Palabras clave:
energias renováveis, caso Bald Hills, legislação, valor econômico da biodiversidade.Resumen
O objetivo do presente artigo é apresentar uma reflexão ambiental e legislativa sobre o valor da legal da biodiversidade. Primeiramente, definiu-se o conceito de biodiversidade e a regulamentação internacional acerca da mesma. O estudo se baseou no caso da presença do Neophema chrysogaster, popularmente ‘papagaio do ventre laranja’, frente ao funcionamento do parque eólico de Bald Hills, Austrália, 2006. O local fora determinado devido o potencial eólico e a necessidade de desenvolvimento de formas alternativas de geração de energia limpa na região. Todavia, verificou-se a região como rota migratória do papagaio. Atualmente a espécie se encontra ameaçada de extinção devido à supressão antrópica ambiental, e sucumbiria se submetida a mais pressões ambientais. A ponderação feita concerne entre como balancear a importância e benefícios a partir dos serviços ecossistêmicos e do valor da biodiversidade de uma espécie protegida face ao funcionamento de uma usina de energia renovável; decidindo por priorizar apenas uma delas, e, condicionar a outra. Embora a discussão sobre a interação do meio ambiente com os avanços tecnológicos seja notoriamente necessária e conclusiva, as métricas que norteiam as decisões tornam-se questionáveis considerando a biodiversidade e serviços ecossistêmicos bens de uso comum do povo.Referencias
ANDRADE, Daniel; ROMEIRO, Ademar. Serviços ecossistêmicos e sua importância para o sistema econômico e bem estar humano. 2009. Disponível em: http://www.avesmarinhas.com.br/Servi%C3%A7os%20ecossist%C3%AAmicos%20e%20sua%20 import%C3%A2ncia%20econ%C3%B4mica.pdf. Acesso em: 27 abr. 2016.
ASHBY, Edwin. Notes on extinct or rare australian birds, with suggestions as to some of the causes of their disappearance: part 2. Emu, v. 23, p. 294–298, 1923. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MU923294. Access: 17 abr. 2016.
AUSTRALIA. Environment protection and biodiversity conservation act. 1999. Available in: https://www.google.com.br/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwi74LeJlfPLAhUDwxQKHfrjBLUQFgghMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.legislation.gov.au%2FDetails%2FC2010C00505%2F9913625c-d46f-4afd-a86e187afd06b406&usg=AFQjCNHyHwHkCcZuQrawDZjvJPZZK3pTw&sig2=SRqHJMH1e6CHKsv7rzcM 3Q. Access: 3 abr. 2016.
AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT. Department of environment. Orange-bellied Parrot. Available in: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgibin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxon_id=747. Access: 17 abr. 2016.
AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT. National recovery plan for the orange-bellied parrot (Neophema chrysogaster). 2006. Available in: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/orange-bellied-parrot-recovery.html. Access: 17 abr. 2016.
BALD hills wind farm. Available in: http://www.baldhillswindfarm.com.au/project/benefits.php. Access: 18 abr. 2016.
BECK, Ulrich. La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós, 2013.
BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL. Species factsheet: neophema chrysogaster. 2016. Available in: http://www.birdlife.org. Access: 17 abr. 2016.
BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL. Wind energy. Available in: http://migratorysoaringbirds.undp.birdlife.org/en/sectors/energy/wind-energy-toc. Access: 29 abr. 2016.
BORGES, Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro. Direito ambiental e teoria jurídica no final do Século XX. In: VARELLA, Marcelo Dias; BORGES, Roxana Cardoso Brasileiro (Orgs.). O novo em direito ambiental. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 1998. p. 11-32.
BROWN, P. B; WILSON, R. I. Orange-bellied parrot neophema chrysogaster. In: GROVES, Richard; RIDE, William (Eds.). Species at risk: research in Australia. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science, 1982. p. 106-115.
DALLIMER, Martin et. al. Quantifying preferences for the natural world using monetary and nonmonetary assessments of value. Conservation Biology, v. 28, n. 2, p. 404-413, 2014.
CARDINALE, Bradley et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, v. 486, p. 59-97, 2012.
CAVALCANTI, Clóvis. Concepções da economia ecológica: suas relações com a economia dominante e a economia ambiental. Estudos Avançados, v. 24, n. 68, p. 53-67, 2010.
CONVENTION BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. History of the convention. Disponível em: https://www.cbd.int/history/. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2016.
CONVENTION BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. Sustaining life on earth: how the convention on biological diversity promotes nature and human well-being. 2000. Available in: https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-sustain-en.pdf. Access: 2 abr. 2016.
COUTO, Elení Pereira; SILVA, Fabrício Oliveira da. Desenvolvimento (in) sustentável. Enciclopédia Biosfera, v. 10, n. 18, p. 41-54, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.conhecer.org.br/enciclop/2014c/pdf/desenvolvimento.pdf. Acesso em: 29 abr. 2016.
ESTEVE PARDO, José. Decidir y regular en la incertidumbre. Respuestas y estrategias del derecho público. In: DARNACULLETA Y GARDELLA, Maria Mercè; ESTEVE PARDO, José; DÖHMANN, Indra Spiecker Gen. (Eds.). Estrategias del derecho ante la incertidumbre y la globalización. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2015. p. 33-46.
ESTEVE PARDO, José. Técnica, riesgo y derecho: tratamiento del riesgo tecnológico en el Derecho ambiental. Barcelona: Ariel, 1999. ESTEVE PARDO, José; TEJADA PALACIOS, Javier. Ciencia y derecho: la nueva división de poderes. Madrid: Fundación Coloquio Jurídico Europeo, 2013.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION. International plant protection convention. 1951. Available in: https://www.ippc.int/en/. Access: 11 abr. 2016.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION. The international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. 2001. Available in: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0510e/i0510e.pdf. Access: 11 abr. 2016.
FERRERO-GARCÍA, Juan José. The international convention for the protection of birds (1902): a missed opportunity for wildlife conservation? Ardeola, p. 385396, 2013.
FORSHAW, Joseph M. Australian parrots. Sydney: Lansdowne & Weldon, 1981.
FOSTER, Caroline E. Science and the precautionary principle in international courts and tribunals: expert evidence, burden of proof and finality. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2011.
GURUSWANY, Lakshman; MCNEELY, Jeffrey. Biological resources and endangered species: history, values, and policy. In: NORTON, Bryan G. Searching for sustainability: interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2003. p. 110-129.
HOLDSWORTH, Mark; DETTMANN, Belinda; BAKER, Barry. Survival in the Orange-bellied Parrot (Neophena chrysogaster). Emu, v. 111, p. 222-228, 2011. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MU09071. Access: 17 abr. 2016. INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY AGENCY. Available in: http://www.irena.org/menu/index.aspx?mnu=cat&PriMenuID=13&CatID=30. Access: 17 abr. 2016.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. Global biodiversity strategy: guidelines for action to safe study end use earth’s biotic wealth sustainably and equitably. 1992. Available in: http://pdf.wri.org/globalbiodiversitystrategy_bw.pdf. Access: 22 abr. 2016.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. Convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora. 1973. Available in: https://www.cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/disc/CITES-Convention-EN.pdf. Access: 11 abr. 2016.
JASSANOF, Sheila. La scienza davanti ai giudici. Milano: Giufrèe, 2001.
JASSANOF, Sheila. Science at the bar: law, science, and technology in America. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1996.
JASSANOF, Sheila. The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1994.
JONAS, Hans. O princípio responsabilidade: ensaio de uma ética para a civilização tecnológica. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2006.
LOYN, R. H.; LANE, B. A.; CHANDLER, C.; CARR, G. W. Ecology of orange-bellied parrots neophema chrysogaster at their main remmant wintering site. Emu, v. 86, p. 195-206, 1986. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MU9860195. Access: 17 abr. 2016.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Observaciones de la modernidad: racionalidad y contingencia en la sociedad moderna. Barcelona: Paidos, 1997.
MARCHANT, Stephen; HIGGINS, Peter (Eds.). Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and antarctic birds: parrots to dollarbird. Melbourne: Oxford University, 1999. v. 4.
NUNES, Paulo A. L. D; KUMAR, Pushpam; DEDEURWAERDERE, Tom (Eds.). Handbook on the economics of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Northamptom: E. Elgar, 2014.
PEARCE, David; MORAN, Dominic. The economic value of biodiversity. London: IUCN, 1994.
PEREIRA, Henrique M.; NAVARRO, Laetitia M.; MARTINS, Inês S. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. Global biodiversity change: the bad, the good, and the unknown. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, v. 37, p. 25-50, 2012. Available in: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-environ-042911-093511?journalCode=energy. Access: 20 abr. 2016.
PIMENTEL, David et. al. Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. BioScience, v. 47, n. 11, p. 747-757, 1997. Available in: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0006-3568%28199712%2947%3A11%3C747%3AEAEBOB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-H. Access: 29 abr. 2016.
PREST, James. The bald hills wind farm debacle. In: BONIHADY, Tim; CHRISTOFF, Peter. Climate law in Australia. Annandale: The Federation, 2007. p. 230-260.
SANTILLI, Juliana. Biodiversidade e conhecimentos tradicionais associados: novos avanços e impasses na criação de regimes legais de proteção. Revista da Fundação da Escola Superior do Ministério Público do Distrito Federal e Territórios, Brasília, ano 10, v. 11, p. 50-75, 2002.
SMALES, I; MUIR, S; MEREDITH, C. Modelled cumulative impacts on the orange-bellied parrot of wind farms across the species’ range in southeastern Australia. 2005. Available in: www.environment.gov.au/epbc/publications/pubs/ wind-farm-bird-risk-orangebelliedparrot.pdf. AcCess: 3 abr. 2016.
TARREGA, Maria Cristina Vidotte Blanco (Coord.). Direito ambiental e desenvolvimento sustentável. São Paulo: RCS, 2007.
TUCKER, Linda; FARRIER, David. Conserving biodiversity via access to bioresources: a natural selection? In: STOIANOFF, Natalie (Ed.). Accessing biological resources: complying with the convention on biological diversity. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004. p. 167-185.
ULANOWICZ, Robert E. Scale and biodiversity policy: a hierarchical approach. In: NORTON, Bryan G. Searching for sustainability: interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2003. p. 288-304.
UNITED NATIONS. Convention on biological diversity. 1992. Available in: https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf. Access: 27 mar. 2016.
UNITED NATIONS. The international convention for the protection of birds (1950). In: TREATY Series: Treaties and international agreements registered or field and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations, 1968. p. 185-196. Available in: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20638/ v638.pdf. Access: 16 abr. 2016.
UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME. Convention on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals. 1979. Available in: http://www.cms.int/en/convention-text. Access: 11 abr. 2016.
UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION. Convention on wetlands of international importance specially as waterfowl habitat. 1971. Available in: http://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/current_convention_text_e.pdf. Access: 11 abr. 2016.
UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION. World heritage convention. 1972. Available in: http://whc.unesco. org/archive/convention-en.pdf. Access: 11 abr. 2016.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Connecting global priorities: biodiversity and human health, summary of the state of knowledge review. 2015. Available in: https://www.cbd.int/health/SOK-biodiversity-en.pdf. Access: 15 abr. 2016.
WORLD WATCH INSTITUTE. Available in: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5997. Access: 16 abr. 2016.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright over their work and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows others to share the work with acknowledgement of the work's authorship and its initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.